We the People are experiencing the unprecedented muzzling of a political candidate during a presidential election and there is nothing we can do—nothing short of subjecting ourselves to arrest and possible grave bodily harm.
This from frontpagemag.com.
The D.C. federal judiciary consists of mindless establishment hacks who over the last 5 years seem to exist purely to rubber stamp leftist prosecutions of their political opponents while giving leftist defendants a pass.
We the People cannot be certain Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is the worst of the bunch, but that’s only because there are so many bad ones from which to choose.
Still Judge Chutkan has made no secret of her burning hatred for Trump and conservatives—We the People—so she’s relishing the moment…
while announcing that the Bill of Rights is optional.
But only for those of us who may be unfortunate (or in President Trump’s case, fortunate) enough to be her political opponent.
The Obama judge argued:
Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech. But that right is not absolute.
Defendant’s free speech is subject to the release conditions imposed at arraignment and it must yield to the orderly administration of justice.
Trump’s attorney had argued that measures restricting a political candidate’s free speech would interfere with the election, while Chutkan claimed that she did not care about the election and would not take it into account.
Of course, not taking the election into account means
providing a decisive advantage to her boss, Biden.
Chutkan argued:
What the defendant is currently doing—the fact that he’s running a political campaign has to yield to the orderly administration of justice.
If that means he can’t say exactly what he wants to say about witnesses in this case, that’s how it has to be.
That’s not how it has to be. That’s how Chutkan is supporting her party by making it so.
The idea that anything Trump says will alter the outcome of the case is nonsense.
The case has been tried in the public
by the media from Day One.
We the People are well aware this decision by this partisan judge is about the unprecedented muzzling of a political candidate during a presidential election.
Final thought: Partisan interpretation—and in this instance abusive interpretation—of our Constitution must be included in the list of corrections to be made when Conservatism and common-sense return to the helm of leadership of this once-great nation.
