During last week’s vice presidential debate, liberals were in a tizzy because they claimed that Mike Pence interrupted Kamala Harris a few times. They also said this was proof of both racism and sexism. This week, Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett was interrupted almost 80 times by democrats, some of who were men (I guess), during her confirmation hearings. As fate would have it, this didn’t not cause a frenzy of outrage from liberals.
CBS, who wouldn’t spend any time investigating the Hunter Biden lap top story, put considerable research into proving Mike Pence was a racist woman-hater for interrupting Kamala Harris during the VP debate last week. Their conclusion:
Pence interrupted Harris 10 times, while she interrupted him 5 times.
Gasp! I can’t verify these numbers but on the off-chance they are real, wouldn’t it at least make Harris a half-racist/sexist?
In any case, 10 interruptions was enough to generate these outraged headlines:
NYT: A Trump-Pence Strategy on the Virus: Interrupt, Distract, Change
Forbes: How Kamala Harris Stopped Pence’s Manterruptions
Independent: Mike Pence repeatedly interrupts Kamala Harris in vice presidential debate
And there’s a million more headlines just like these from every liberal media source out there. There are however exactly zero headlines expressing outrage that male democrats repeatedly interrupted Amy Coney Barrett during her confirmation hearings.
RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniels noticed what the liberal media ignored:
Democrats interrupted Judge Barrett 78 TIMES.
Zero cries of sexism or “mansplaining” from the media.
Their bias and selective outrage is unreal! #ConfirmACB pic.twitter.com/UKqkFeau0u
— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) October 16, 2020
78 interruptions and no outrage versus 10 interruptions that probably never happened and tons of outrage. Liberals keep finding new ways to tell us that they live by a different set of rules.
If there was no outrage for democrats interrupting ACB, you bet bet there was less than none when NBC liberal activist Savannah Guthrie interrupted President Trump in last night’s town hall. Here’s a fun super cut of the opposite of impartiality:
SUPERCUT!@SavannahGuthrie repeatedly cuts off @realDonaldTrump in ‘town hall’ pic.twitter.com/5aP3Nh9ryK
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 16, 2020
In addition to being the wife of a former Al Gore stoolie, Guthrie is also a woman. Trump is a man, which puts them on opposite ends of the gender line. If it’s sexist for a man to interrupt a woman, shouldn’t it also be sexist for a woman to interrupt a man? Isn’t that how equality works?
I’m just kidding, that was a trick question. The fact is that liberals have a double-standard so anything they do is okay, even if it’s exactly the same thing Republicans do that they pretend to be outraged over.
So we can add interrupting to the long list of things that aren’t bad if democrats do them like rape, treason, espionage, corruption, and mom jeans on a dude. When liberals were making up the rules, they knew what the hell they were doing, which is the only time we can say that.
